Part 1. Introduction

The Natural Theory of Relativity took two years to develop. It began with a conviction that a paradox does not belong in science.

It ended with a conviction that there are paradoxes everywhere, unseen because we choose not to see them.

It is as if we only look at the part of a tree above ground which is visible to us and as such cannot fathom it’s full structure or purpose without knowing what lies below the ground which is invisible to us.

Though we know exactly how fast light moves through space we don’t begin to know why it moves at the speed that it does, nor do we ask, and as such we don’t begin to understand the phenomena that is so important to our existence.

We know that there is a reaction for every action but we don’t know why for it makes no sense if you think about it, or why gravity pulls smaller matter towards a larger mass, but only if that larger mass is rotating, or why acceleration occurs with G Forces, or why the Moon is made of the same stuff of Earth, or why Venus rotates in the opposite direction, or why Saturn has rings, or why glaciers exist only in the northern hemisphere, or why is DNA here so early, or why a thousand theoretical questions go unanswered because they are never asked. It is almost as if science itself is blind.

The Natural Theory of Relativity attempts to ask and answer some of these fundamental questions as a beginning inquiry into the true nature of things, into the entire whole. It begins at the dawn of modern theoretical physics in the nineteenth century and specifically with the Michelson/Morley aether drift experiment conducted in 1887 and before that the H. Fizeau water drag experiment in 1859 that inspired Michelson and Morley.

The 1887 experiment failed which opened the door for Albert Einstein and his relativity theories published in 1905 and l9l5.

It also opened the door, albeit 113 years later, for an opposing theory published in 2000 on this web-site, The Natural Theory of Relativity by Murray Tovi.